Unamas Label in English

Unamas Label in English / This is the information site regarding High Definition & Surround Music productions.



Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Google Bookmarks

Why does a UNAMAS Label release MQA Format?

Mick Sawaguchi C.E.O UNAMAS Label


“Those MQA albums released by UNAMAS, are they high-res, something doubtful or mere lossless?” We often receive such questions. So, I would like to talk about the “features of MQA” from the viewpoint of high-res music producer myself.
Bob Stuart, the father of MQA, has devoted his long period of time in the research and development of digital technologies and music. His invention of “MLP” is the lossless coding technology adopted in DVD-Audio and further inherited in Dolby TrueHD. Being a fellow member of AES, I am one of admirers of Bob for his continued efforts in technology development and his strong passion of music.

It was 2014, if I remember correctly; when Bob brought a new coding technology called MQA (Master Quality Authenticated) and demonstrated it in the studio of SONA’s in TOKYO Japan. I myself visited with some UNAMAS mater tracks, and Bob coded them with MQA on the spot for a comparison listening of MQA processed sound against the original: An evaluation namely “A-B test”. At that time, I highly valued the factors of accuracy in the sound rises and of blur-less sound staging. Particularly impressive were the instruments that contained rich transients, and I commented to Bob, “The impulse response sounds superb!”


Afterwards, I sent some sample recordings to England, and I managed the evaluation playback of the encoded 48kHz/24bit FLAC files using MQA-equipped Meridian Prime headphone amp and Foober 2000 player in my studio. I had an impression of the lows slightly recessed but they successfully reproduced the original masters, and above all, its transfer rate was merely around 1Mbps to preserve the quality of 192kHz/24bit masters, which looked like a magical advantage, hence the decision of UNAMAS Label to incorporate MQA.

I will try to explain the warp and the woof about MQA following some of documents presented by Bob because we Japanese tend to be a “hardware-oriented” race not quickly appreciating new technologies until they understand the logic instead of simply admitting their satisfaction in listening!
The MQA advantages I would list are:
1. Excellent impulse response [This is exactly the factor of Studio Quality Authentication.]
2. Realistic delivery in lower transfer rate, also decodable original master sound quality.
3. Installation to existing package media (CDs and alike) without altering their fundamental specifications, thus fully backward compatible.

Factor #1: “What is the technical background of excellent impulse response?”
I will discuss this issue along some slides that Bob prepared for his technology presentation. First of all, now the music delivery chain from digital recording to final equipment at home is pretty much digital domain today, but what Bob defined is the reality of signal alteration in each step within the digital domain.


The time domain information has been lost in the complicated process between A/D and D/A.

Various approaches have been introduced for improvement to date such as D-D converters, rigid master clock supplies, and jitter reductions, but MQA sails upstream to the very beginning where the recording happens: It identifies the A/D converter used for the recording so that MQA decoders of end-users can reconstruct the same time domain signal structure by correcting the digital delivery file, which is the major feature of MQA. MQA refers this to “de-blur” or “de-bleeding”. It requires to collect information about DAW and A/D converter for the specific session from the engineer or the record label company and to make analysis of equipment behavior. We, UNAMAS, always attach the memo clarifying the names of DAW and converter products when we request MQA encoding and also present the raw data sample sound before the final mix. This enables them to analyze the digital signal structure at the point of A/D conversion in the original recording that is coded into metadata for MQA encoding and eventually resides in the MQA-FLAC file. When one feels this sounds a bother, or suspicious about his know-how being ripped off, this system won’t help such record labels and manufacturers.

The essential factor is the coding framework in which the temporal information at the point of A/D conversion is conceived as metadata in MQA encode that enables D/A to function exactly on the same temporal slices through MQA decoding.
Why is the impulse response so important for music reproduction? Regarding this, Bob describes, “High res has been pursuing the extended frequency range because of higher sampling, but when we analyze music signals, their spectral distribution is triangular.


What is extended by higher sampling is the impulse response and pre-/post-echoes in the A/D conversion that are perceived as temporal blur.” Human auditory sensitivity to impulses is in the region of 5-to-8µsec, and MQA can handle as close as 10 µsec at the moment.

The graph below shows the difference of de-blurring ability between 192kHz/24bit PCM master and MQA in which the temporal errors with 192/24 has the distribution of about 100 µsec range while that of MQA stays within 10 µsec. This can dramatically improve the resolution and imaging/sound-staging in music signals.



Figure . The impulse response comparison of MQA and 192kHz system

Factor #2: The advantage of lower transfer rate
Larger file size costs longer time for download. In case of streaming, the intermittent sound loss is considered a fatal disadvantage, and therefore they use commonly such data rates as 128k to 256kbps typically found in MP3. In today’s network environment, the transfer rate of 1Mbps is a logical choice for high quality transmission, and MQA’s 48kHz/24bit encoded data provides a definite advantage to offer the master quality without any stress by decoding data. It was truly impressive when I had a chance to listen to the playback of music in 192-24 from a streaming through MQA coding in the spring of 2017.

Figure: Compactness of file size in high-efficiency coding of the same album*MQA file encoded from the 352.8/24 master

MQA coding technology is named “Audio Origami”. The master data are folded twice and convoluted into the area of 44.1/16 data area in the minimized case. By using this technology for CD, the existing CD package can contain the high res master sound signal that can be played as a normal CD while the master sound can be reproduced via an MQA decoder. (In order to conform to the Red Book Standard, the master’s sampling frequency needs to be multiple of 44.1kHz.)



Figure : The final stage of MQA download file – the third step of “Audio Origami” folding

MQA-CD is like “Old Bottle, New Wine” and one of my colleagues with much curiosity of quality of music was Samurai Seiji who collaborated with me in experiment and evaluation, I was deeply moved when the experiment was successful. What an amazing to playback Hi-Res from CD!
And we released the world’s first MQA-CD “A. Piazzolla by Strings and Oboe” in the spring of 2017. My UNAMAS Label basically does not release titles in package, and OTTAVA Records takes care of all those releases since Piazzolla disc.



Souvenir of a brainstorming for MQA-CD production in October 2016


Memorable world’s first MQA-CD release in March 2017

More technical documents are available from MQAWebsite.